Thursday, June 28, 2012

Analogy and Homology



Homology



Two species that share a homologous trait are the Porpoise and Humans. The porpoise is similar to a dolphin however tends to be smaller, has a rounded head and a blunt jaw and use their extremities to swim. Humans stand up straight, have two legs and two arms that are used to walk on land, but can also be used to swim as well. The feature that is important in the comparison with humans and the porpoise is the fin and hands, which stem from a common ancestor.




The porpoise flipper can be compared to the arm and hand of a human. The flipper is shorter with more restricted movements, where as the arm of a human is long, a little less then half the size of the body. The motion of the arm is numerous because of the many different joints. The flipper and arm however do share the number of flanges, which are five. However the purpose of these traits are quite different. The human use their arms and hands for tremendous activity, lifting, pushing, climbing, eating, and swimming. All these activities require different functions from the arm and hands, which is the cause for the great complexity in this structure on the human body. In the case of the porpoise, there are less requirements of the flipper. The flipper of the porpoise is mostly used to swim, and not really anything else due to the short nature.



The common ancestor between the human and the porpoise came millions and millions of years ago, but the reason we can tell this common ancestor gave them this homologous trait is because the similarity of the structure. Although the functions are not the same, the bone structure evolved and changed based on an original structure. The differences only formed based on environmental differences. 

Analogy

The two species that I choose for the analogous trait are a bird and a butterfly. The butterfly is part of the insect family, they are generally small however to vary in size, as well as shape and color. They’re look is based on their environment; the color of their wings is best suited for their environment. A bird also varies in shape, size and color. Birds however have the ability to be quite a bit larger then that of a butterfly, however both creators share the analogous trait of the wing.





The trait of the wing in both bird and butterfly allow the creature flight. In both creatures there are only two wings, on either side of the body allowing for the body to be the center of balance. Roughly the shape of the wings are similar, to engage in similar ways of flight. Although the butterfly is a member of the insect family and the bird is a member of its on class, the have both evolved using the same analogous trait, the wing.





Both the bird and the butterfly can be traced back to the time of the dinosaurs, in fact birds are said to be descendants of dinosaurs. At this time both ancestors had the ability to fly, however the question is if we go back far enough, does their common ancestor have this analogous trait of the wing. The answer is no, this trait was developed based on the environment, and because the structure is so different it is hard to believe that it came from the common ancestor. The butterfly has no bones in the wing, where as the bird has many bones. In fact the structure of the creature itself is entirely different so t
his evolutionary development with the wing was based on evolving in a similar environment. 


Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Decoding Time

Can you decode my Sentence?

"ATAATACTAAGCAACCGCGAGTGTTAGCCGCTTGTAGATCTTAG"

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Initially I was going to choose Alfred Russel Wallace, because he and Charles Darwin's competition influenced Darwin to publish his ideas and be in competition for who discovered evolution. However without the ideas of Thomas Malthus, neither man would have come up the idea of natural selection which is a key component in the idea of evolution.

Thomas Malthus's Essay on the Principle of Population, influenced Darwin to discover natural selection. In the essay Malthus argued that in nature animals produce more offspring when resources are plentiful and there are little to not predators. In other words population size is held in check by the resources available for the species. Darwin expanded this notion, he states that with two facts from Malthus research, more offspring are produced then will survive and with a limited amount of resources competition must ensue, are all he needed to develop his theory on natural selection. He saw through Malthus how natural selection could be explained.
Malthus Link

Three of the points under "How does Evolution work," correlate to Malthus's influence. Starting with resources are limited. Malthus argued that species are held in check by their resources. In order to produce offspring there must be plentiful of resources, however when famine and other events that devastate the resources occurs the population suffers. Thus there must be a limit on resources, their is not an endless supply. The second is that organisms with better access to resources will be more successful in their reproductive efforts.This is directly stated in Malthus's Essay on the Principle of Population. It was his idea initially that when there is more resources there will be more offspring because the conditions are right and when there is little resources less offspring will be produced. Which leads us to believe that those species with more access to resources would have more offspring then those with out the resources. Then lastly Malthus influenced the point of who gets access to these limited resources? After reading Malthus's ideas Darwin expanded his points based on two facts if there are more offspring produced then will make it to adulthood, and competition for resources must ensue do to limitations, then those offspring with better traits will out compete the others and survive to pass on these traits. 

Without Thomas Malthus ideas on the population and resources, Charles Darwin would have not developed his ideas of natural selection to there fullest extent. It was Malthus essay that inspired both Darwin and Wallace to develop ideas on natural selection and it allowed Darwin to explain not only that natural selection occurred, but how it can be explained. With the influence from Malthus, Darwin could explain that those species with desirable traits would reproduce and survive to pass on those traits. However those species with undesirable traits would not live to pass on their genetic material due to there inability to get enough resources to reproduce.

Darwin's time-frame in publishing his work was also highly influence by the church and the "status quo" of the time. Darwin's family was highly regarded in society in Britain and his wife was also highly religious and so he was reluctant to publish his works in fear of not only dangerous repercussions from the church but also about how his ideas would change how society saw his family. His beliefs would reshape how everyone believed life came into being and so Darwin was hesitant to state his ideas openly. It wasn't until Alfred Russel Wallace sent Darwin his published papers that Darwin knew he needed to get his ideas out there. He knew that if he didn't publish his thoughts then Wallace would get credit for discovering evolution. Thus, the church and social structure delayed his publications, but never his research, which then lead to his eventual publication of his book, Origins of Species.